Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) caused a global pandemic threat with more than 11.8 million confirmed cases and more than 0.5 million deaths as of 3 July 2020. Given the lack of definitive pharmaceutical interventions against SARS-CoV-2, multiple therapeutic strategies and personal protective applications are being used to reduce the risk of high mortality and community spread of this infection. Currently, more than a hundred vaccines and/or alternative therapeutic regimens are in clinical trials, and some of them have shown promising results in improving the immune cell environment and controlling the infection. In this review, we discussed high-performance multi-directory strategies describing the uncontrolled deregulation of the host immune landscape associated with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and treatment strategies using an anti-neoplastic regimen. We also followed selected current treatment plans and the most important on-going clinical trials and their respective outcomes for blocking SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis through regenerative medicine, such as stem cell therapy, chimeric antigen receptors, natural killer (NK) cells, extracellular vesicular-based therapy, and others including immunomodulatory regimens, anti-neoplastic therapy, and current clinical vaccine therapy.
Treatment Options for SARS-CoV-2-Infected Patient
Due to the rapid spread of SARS-CoV-2 infection globally, there is an imperative need for the development of effective therapeutic interventions. Drug development is a time consuming and a long-step process that requires initial safety assessment and further evaluation in multiple phases of clinical trials. The current emphasis of new anti-SARS-CoV-2 therapeutic interventions is to achieve a decrease in viral load, limit hyper-inflammation propagation, reduces disease severity, and improve anti-viral immunity. Table 1 representing current multi-directorial interventions are in clinical trials and depicted
Convalescent Plasma (CP) Therapy and ACE2 Blocker
CP is a passive immunotherapy technique in which plasma or neutralizing antibodies are purified from the recovered patients and given to the newly infected patients as treatment. CP, when given to SARS-COV-2-infected patients, has shortened the mortality rate, hospital stay, and depletes the viral load within 7 days after treatment [53]. A rapid increase in neutralizing antibodies was observed following transfusion of CP into SARS-CoV-2-infected patients. However, this offers only a short-term immunity to SARS-CoV-2 patients and does not provide long-term protection [54]. Currently, more than 50 clinical trials on CP as a treatment for COVID-19 are on-going—in China (NCT04264858), Sweden, India, United States, and many other countries—on large cohorts, some of which have already reached phase three out of four of a clinical trial, as listed in Table 1 [55,56]. These CPs are usually obtained from donors with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and those who have been symptom free for 14 days. These CPs are a good source of polyclonal neutralizing antibodies, but their outcomes are unpredictable due to serum variability isolated from different patients [57]. There are certain points that need to be considered to improve the efficacy of CP therapy: it ideally necessitates standardizing the antibody titer from donor patients in accordance with the optimal concentration required for effective treatment, dynamic changes in a cytokine storm, and reduction in viral burden. Early intervention of CP before onset or during the initial stage of symptoms will help to improve clinical outcomes compared to those in which CP is given at the time of severe symptomatic condition.
Besides CP, other treatment strategies that have been reported for SARS-CoV-2 are host-directed approaches, such as blocking the ACE2 receptor (lisinopril) or renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) (losartan, telmisartan) of the host cells to prevent viral infection. Using surface spike glycoprotein (S-protein), SARS-CoV-2 enters the host cell by binding to host cells ACE2 receptor. Currently, these angiotensin blockers are in phase three out of four of clinical trials for SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals (NCT04328012, NCT04340557, NCT04394117, NCT04356495, NCT04394117) [58]. A recent study has performed high-throughput molecular docking and screening to investigate an FDA-approved library of pharmacologically active compounds, which target the interphase of SARS-CoV-2 S-protein and ACE2 receptor. A number of compounds were found to bind to the virus binding motifs of the ACE2 receptor (GNF-5, RS504393, TNP, and eptifibatide acetate) and viral S-protein (KT203, BMS195614, KT185, RS504393, and GSK1838705A), respectively [59]. These molecules could also be effective in controlling the rapid spread of SARS-CoV-2 infection in a specific inhibitory manner. It is noteworthy that ACE2 inhibitors are highly recommended medications for patients with cardiovascular diseases, and treatment with ACE2 inhibitors could increase the numbers of ACE2 receptors in their lungs making them high-risk for coronavirus infection [60]. Serine protease inhibitors, such as camostat mesylate, nafamostat mesylate, and gabexate mesylate, act as anti-coagulant for hemodialysis are found to block virus replication [61] and inhibit serine protease TMPRSS2, which is required for SARS-CoV-2 entry into the alveolar cells through viral S-protein priming [62]. Currently, camostat mesylate is in multiple clinical trials in various locations (USA, Denmark, and Israel), which will be given either alone or in combination with salvage therapy for COVID-19-infected patients (NCT04353284, NCT04321096, NCT04374019, NCT04355052).
3.2. Targeting Deregulated Signaling in SARS-COV-2-Infected Patients and Treatment Strategies
Interaction of viral coat protein and genomic material to toll-like receptors (TLR3 and TLR7/8) present on innate immune cells triggers the induction of cytokine secretion and activation of multiple antiviral signaling pathways including nuclear factor κB (NF-κB), IFN regulatory factor-3 (IRF3), Janus kinase/signal transducer, and activator of transcription (JAK/STAT) signaling pathways [63]. Identification of such an altered pathway during virus infection will help to unknot the molecular cascade and determine key targetable molecular players. JAK/STAT signaling is a key pathway that transmits cytokine-induced extracellular signaling to intracellular biological effects. IL6 is one of the key cytokines that regulate JAK/STAT pathways and is shown to be up-regulated in COVID-19 patients, thus leading to cytokine storm development [64]. In turn, the JAK/STAT pathway has been shown to regulate IL6 production and leads to aberrant activation of chronic inflammation [65]. It is noteworthy that elevated IL6 levels in circulating blood is an indicator of increased risk of cardiovascular disease, multiple organ dysfunction, and therefore, it is associated with the enhanced detrimental risk to SARS-CoV-2-infected patients. Since IL6 is presented as the driver of cytokine storm in SARS-CoV-2 infection, therapies targeting IL6 such as monoclonal antibodies tocilizumab (Actemra®, Genentech), sarilumab (Kevzara®, Regeneron/Sanofi), and siltuximab (Sylvant™, EUSA Pharma) is under investigation for COVID-19 treatment either alone or in combination in multiple clinical trials (more than 50 to date), and 11 of them are already in phase three out of four of a clinical trial (NCT04412772, NCT04377750, NCT04356937, NCT04372186). Pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, and the safety of tocilizumab in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have been well-established previously [66]. Though tocilizumab is effective in reducing the cytokine storm and provided beneficial clinical outcomes in combination with other therapies, noticeable cases of refractory to tocilizumab treatment are presented, and therefore, alternative biological agents to overcome inflammatory cascade are necessary [67]. In scenario tocilizumab refractory cases, blocking of the JAK/STAT pathway, which is the primary regulator of IL6 signaling with specific inhibitors (baricitinib, fedratinib, tofacitinib, peficitinib, and ruxolitinib) could provide an alternative strategy to attenuate the host inflammatory response associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection [67,68]. To date, there are several clinical trials driving safety and efficacy of JAK/STAT inhibitors:
NF-kB is a critical regulator of both innate and adaptive immune responses as this signaling activates several cytokines’ gene expression and anti-apoptotic proteins. Therefore, it is required for optimal immune responses [69]. Activation of the NF-kB pathway is often associated with inflammatory disease, B-cell malignancies, and rheumatoid arthritis [70]. Notably, the upregulation of IL6 and TNFα in SARS-CoV spike protein-induced murine macrophage was shown to be regulated via activation of NF-KB signaling [71]. As a therapeutic intervention, pharmacological inhibition of the NFkB pathway provided protective responses from SARS-CoV infection, suggesting that NF-kB inhibition might be an effective strategy to block COVID-19 pathogenesis [72]. However, this is also limited by an escape mechanism mediated by viruses that manipulate NF-kB signaling through their multifunctional viral proteins [73]. Therefore, a potential strategy to target NF-kB signaling in case of viral infection need to be considered, such as those that target NF-kB downstream effector molecules; TNFα was found to be associated to SARS-CoV infection through TNFα-converting enzyme (TACE)-dependent shedding of the ACE2 receptor during virus entry [74]. Monoclonal antibodies targeting TNFα (infliximab, adalimumab) are currently in clinical trials for SARS-CoV-2-infected patients (NCT04425538, NCT04344249).
3.3. Regenerative Medicine in COVID-19 Treatment
Novel coronavirus infection has gained global attention due to its rapid transmission and high mortality rate. Therefore, to achieve an effective therapeutic regimen, massive research in multiple directions and clinical trials are on-going throughout the world. Regenerative medicine offers new therapeutic tools and related products, such as stem cell therapy, CAR T cell therapy, natural killer (NK) cell therapy, exosomes, and other tissue products. Notably, among these, mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-based therapies are now being considered in multiple clinical trials.
3.3.1. Stem Cell-Based Therapeutic Interventions
Stem cell-based therapies have become a promising therapeutic approach, particularly for a disease that is challenging to treat. Notably, stem cells including pluripotent or multipotent cells are found to be resistant to viral infection and associated with intrinsically expressed interferon-gamma-stimulated genes [75]. As direct evidence, human hematopoietic cells are shown to be non-permissive to Myxoma virus infection [76]. There are several stem cell-based clinical trials (37 trials to date) to treat COVID-19 that have been started in several countries, including the USA, China, Spain, and Brazil, registered on ClinicalTrials.gov [77]. The details of these 33 clinical trials have been described by Tsuchiya et al. [77]. Among the various population of stem cell types, MSCs are representing the most promising candidate for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infections due to their low invasive acquisition procedure, high proliferation rate, ease of expanding, maintaining and cryopreserving, and they can be isolated from several tissues (peripheral blood, cord blood, dental pulp, adipose tissue, bone marrow, fetal liver, etc.). MSCs have immunomodulatory, anti-fibrotic, anti-oxidant, and anti-inflammatory properties and, therefore, may inhibit the cytokine storm, which is a foremost clinical concern of SARS-CoV-2 infection [78]. A clinical trial of seven COVID-19 patients has proven the therapeutic efficiency of intravenously transmitted MSCs in improving immunological functional and clinical outcomes [79]. A case report of SARS-CoV-2 patients presented improvement in immunomodulation (increase in T cell subsets count and decrease in inflammatory cytokines levels) after treatment with human umbilical cord Wharton’s jelly-derived MSCs isolated from a healthy donor [80]. It is worthwhile to note that the clinical efficacy of MSCs depends on generally how the MSCs have been prepared, the source of preparation, expansion protocol, and pre-treatment with pharmacological factors, which can further improve the therapeutic effects of MSCs [81].
3.3.2. Extracellular Vesicles (EVs) for COVID-19 Treatment
EVs are nano-sized lipid membrane-enclosed cell-secreted particles, which are utilized for cellular communications by transferring information in the form of protein and nucleic acid. EVs are present in all body fluids and secreted by all cell types. Therefore, these EVs may contribute to the spread of SARS-CoV-2, as they can transfer the ACE2 receptor from one cell to another or different cell types [82]. EVs can be used as a delivery vehicle for chemotherapeutic agents, siRNA, and for transfer of critical cellular information in a lipid-bound protective format to distant recipient target cells. As a therapeutic purpose, the delivery of human recombinant soluble ACE2 (hrsACE2) through EVs for ARDS has been shown to be effective in reducing cytokine storm (NCT01597635) [83]. Therefore, it is speculated that the delivery of EVs encapsulated ACE2 receptor would likely increase the efficiency in neutralizing SARS-CoV-2 infection [84].
Bone marrow or MSC-derived EVs have anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, pro-angiogenic, and anti-fibrotic properties and, therefore, can act as a therapeutic regimen for SARS-CoV-2 and have shown promising results in multiple malignancies [85,86]. Importantly, MSC-derived EVs have been identified to attenuate influenza virus-induced acute lung injury in pigs by preventing virus shedding, replication, and virus-induced production of pro-inflammatory cytokines [87]. In line with this, a clinical trial was carried out in which SARS-CoV-2-infected patients (n = 24) were given exosomes (ExoFlo™) intravenously, which were derived from allogeneic bone marrow MSCs. Out of 24 patients, 17 (71%) were completely recovered with a significant increase in neutrophil, CD4+, CD8+ T cell count (46%), and decrease in C-reactive protein levels in the blood indicating MSC-EVs can be a promising therapeutic candidate for severe SARS-CoV-2 infection with the capacity to restore oxygenation and downregulate cytokine storm [88]. Another clinical trial that is underway has intended to deliver MSC-derived EVs through inhalation to SARS-CoV-2-infected patients (NCT04276987). It is important to note that not only EVs derived from MSCs can be utilized for therapeutic purposes, and certain antiviral, anti-inflammatory, or other drugs can also be loaded into EVs for disease therapy. Therefore, repurposing these drugs with a proper formulation into EVs may improve the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 treatment.
3.3.3. NK Cell-Based Therapy
NK cells are major immune cells and require the development of both innate and adaptive immune response through their cytotoxic activity against virus-infected cells and cancer cells. SARS-CoV-2-infected patients with severe disease have reduced NK cell count, and these exhausted NK cells showed an increased expression of suppressing receptor CD94/NK group-2 member A (NKG2A) in contrast to NKG2D (an activating receptor of NK cells) [89]. A previous study has demonstrated that treatment with soluble IL15 can functionally enhance circulating NK cell count and induces its antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) activity [90]. Using all this knowledge, a CAR NK has been designed (NKG2D-ACE2-CAR-NK) and is currently in phase one out of two of a clinical trial involving 90 SARS-CoV-2-infected participants (NCT04324996), with main objectives being to check efficacy, safety, and tolerability of NK CAR products. NKG2D-ACE2-CAR-NK cells have been derived from cord blood cells and designed to secrete IL15 super-agonist, which could increase the sustainability and activity of infused NK cells, and secrete GM-CSF neutralizing scFv, which could abrogate cytokine storm and associated neurotoxicity. Another phase one out of two clinical trial (NCT04365101) involving 72 COVID-19 patients has been recruited to determine the safety and efficacy of CYNK-001, immunotherapy containing NK cells derived from human placental CD34+ cells and culture-expanded. Other NK cell-dependent clinical trials underway have been demonstrated
3.3.4. Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-Cell Therapy
CAR T therapy represents an adoptive form of T cell-based therapy, where T cells are reprogrammed to express synthetic receptor directed against the specific antigen. CAR T therapy has shown significant promising improvement, specifically in B-cell malignancies [70] and also in solid tumors [91]. Through early encouraging results, recent studies have demonstrated the success of CAR T therapy against viral infection, including chronic hepatitis B-virus (HBV) infection and HBV related hepatocellular carcinoma [92,93]. Therefore, scientists are now investigating the prospects of CAR T therapy against COVID-19 disease. Janice et al. have engineered CD8+ lymphocytes from healthy individuals into SARS-CoV-specific CD8+ T cells by using CD8+ memory T cell receptors isolated from previously recovered SARS-CoV-infected individuals. These engineered SARS-CoV CD8+ T cells displayed functional profile and avidity comparable to that of natural SARS-specific memory CD8+ T cells from recovered individuals [94] and, therefore, providing a rationale to design or engineer SARS-CoV-2-specific adaptive therapies. Notably, CD8+ T cells are essential for protection against virus and a high level of virus-specific CD8+ T cells is correlated to decrease viral load and favorable clinical outcomes. However, adoptive T cell transfer therapy also has multiple obstacles: the first caveats are the genetic restriction for allogeneic T cell transfer from an unrelated individual, second is T cell exhaustion or failure to proliferate after infusion, the third is the creation of massive side-effects such as cytokine storm, and the forth obstacle is excessive proliferation of infused T cells that could lead to the enhanced killing of virus-infected cells and enormous tissue injury. Therefore, it is important to consider these obstacles before designing a novel CAR product for adoptive therapy. In line with this, HLA-E-restricted unconventional CD8 T cell therapy against SARS-CoV-2 may offer several advantages to improve the ability to kill virus-infected cells, limiting the extent of inflammatory responses and tissue damage [95]. HLA-E is a non-classical major histocompatibility complex Class-I molecule characterized by limited polymorphism and, therefore, will have limited alloreactivity responses. Recently, investigators from Singapore have started a clinical trial to determine the efficacy of adoptive cell therapy on severely infected SARS-CoV-2 patients (https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04351659). Though CAR T cell therapy is found to be effective against B-cell lymphoma, only very few CAR T cell-based studies are now in clinical trials for SARS-CoV-2 infection, which suggests that there are numerous obstacles that require clinical optimizations for successful generation of anti-SARS-CoV-2 CAR T therapy. The workflow of CAR therapy generation has been described in Figure 1.
3.4. Antineoplastic Therapy for SARS-CoV-2-Infected Patients
It is noticeable that cancer patients due to compromised immune responses have a worse clinical outcome and four times higher risk of hospitalization compared to other subjects when infected with SARS-COV-2. Therefore, anti-cancer agents should be carefully given to these populations. Importantly, anti-cancer therapy modulates the immune system and thereby might be beneficial to at least SARS-CoV-infected healthy individuals (Table 2). As the development of new vaccines usually takes several years, existing drugs including FDA-approved anti-cancer agents are now in clinical trials for COVID-19 treatment. Corticosteroids such as dexamethasone and prednisolone, which are utilized for the treatment of lymphoma and leukemia’s are now in phase ¾ clinical trials as mono or combination therapy with other anti-viral agents. Immunomodulatory drugs, such as lenalidomide (Revlimid) and thalidomide generally used for multiple myeloma, lymphoma, graft-versus-host disease, and myelodysplastic syndromes, work through multiple mechanisms such as decreasing TNF-α production and stimulating T cells’ function [96]. A case report of 45-year-old women with SARS-CoV-2 infection who were treated with thalidomide in combination with low-dose short-term glucocorticoid showed dramatic inhibition of cytokine surge, with an absolute increase in lymphocyte counts and achieved relieve from digestive imbalance [97]. Furthermore, clinical trials with these immunomodulators for the treatment of COVID-19 are underway. Selinexor (Karyopharm, Newton, MA, USA) is a nuclear export inhibitor that binds to the exportin 1 and prevents the translocation of several anti-apoptotic proteins (from the nucleus to cytoplasm) involved in cancer progression [98]. This nuclear export inhibitor could retain SAR-CoV2 essential viral proteins into the host nucleus, thus suppressing its virulence and pathogenesis [99]. The FDA has approved Selinexor for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in combination with dexamethasone, and now this drug is in a clinical trial for SARS-CoV-2-infected patients [98].
Cytotoxic chemotherapy, such as DNA damaging agents targeting topoisomerase-2A etoposide, is considered as primary chemotherapy for the treatment of several cancers including leukemia, neuroblastoma testicular, lung cancer, lymphoma, and ovarian cancer [100]. Notably, a clinical trial for a small cohort of SARS-CoV-2-infected patients, salvage treatment along with etoposide in adjunction to immunosuppressants resulted in an overall favorable outcome (NCT04356690) [101]. Therefore, an etoposide-based treatment strategy might be clinically acceptable as another salvage approach for severely SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals [102]. The chemotherapeutic drug methotrexate in combination with salvage therapy has proven to be effective in immnunostabilization for SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals. In fact, high doses of methotrexate along with leucovorin (drug decrease toxic effect of methotrexate) can rescue a SARS-COV-2-triggered panic attack [103]. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is the most potent vascular permeability inducer and has been found to be unregulated in SARS-CoV-2-infected patients and identified as the most important indicator of the severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection [104,105]. Bevacizumab (Genentech, San Francisco, CA, USA) is a humanized monoclonal antibody that inhibits VEGF-A and is currently in clinical trials in China and Italy.
Small molecular kinase inhibitors are widely used in cancer therapeutics; they inhibit respective specific tyrosine or serine-threonine kinase and, thereby, block oncogenic signaling. One such widely used FDA-approved small molecular irreversible inhibitor of Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) “ibrutinib” has extensively shown its clinical efficacy in B-cell lymphoma, such as mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCLs) [70]. Ibrutinib inhibits BTK-suppressed activation of NF-kB signaling and thus prevents expression of multiple cytokines gene expression [70]. Recently, Treon et al. have elucidated the efficacy of ibrutinib in which five COVID-19 patients were given ibrutinib at the dose recommended for the treatment of lymphoma (420 mg/day). Ibrutinib treatment reduced the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines; the patients did not experience dyspnea and did not require hospitalization [106]. Another group investigated the effects of acalabrutinib (2nd generation of BTK inhibitor) on disease progression of SARS-CoV-2-infected patients. With a cohort of 19 severe COVID-19 patients, treatment with acalabrutinib improved oxygenation balance in the majority of patients and significantly reduced C-reactive protein and IL6 levels [107]. Though a small cohort was investigated for ibrutinib efficacy, it surely undoubtedly offers interesting possibilities as combinatorial treatment for SARS-CoV-2 treatment in a large cohort. Alemtuzumab is a monoclonal antibody that acts as an immunosuppressive drug, which binds to CD52, a protein present on mature lymphocytes and is in clinical treatment for CLL and multiple sclerosis [108]. A recent study for the management of clinical multiple sclerosis along with SARS-CoV-2 infection represented alemtuzumab treatment could attenuate COVID-19 associated symptoms and induce positive changes in the immune functions against SARS-CoV-2 infection [109]. Further clinical investigations are needed to conclude the potentials of alemtuzumab as a therapeutic regimen for COVID-19. PI3K/Akt signaling has been widely studied as one of the most critical intracellular pathways considered to be critically upregulated in chemo-resistant cancer patients [70,110]. A number of pan-PI3K and PI3K isoform-specific inhibitors have been available, and some of them are in clinical trials for multiple cancer types [110]. Importantly, inhibition of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway has shown a significant reduction in MERS-CoV replication in vitro previously [111,112]. Therefore, targeting the PI3K pathway may represent a novel therapeutic intervention for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Duvelisib (PI3K inhibitor) is currently under investigation in a clinical trial for SARS-CoV-2-infected patients (NCT04372602).
Immune check point inhibitors, such as pembrolizumab, nivolumab treatment, inhibits programmed death receptor-1 (PD1) and its ligand PD-L1 axis, which restores anti-tumor immunity, transforms the therapeutic outcomes and, therefore, is utilized as a therapeutic regimen in multiple cancers [113]. A case study is presented by Emre et al. of an old lady who had metastatic malignant melanoma and was infected with SARS-CoV-2. Treatment with nivolumab provided her with an excellent clinical condition even though she had multiple co-morbidities [114]. Similar observations reported in another case study with pembrolizumab representing favorable clinical outcomes might be associated with the PD1/PD-L1 blockade [115]. However, further clinical trials with these checkpoint inhibitors are needed to be recruited to achieve a defined conclusive efficacy.
3.5. Vaccine Development for COVID-19
Like other vaccines, the development of an effective vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 that can prevent the spread of infection, prevent new infections, and can provide immunity to people will be the most economical and long-term therapeutic strategy for COVID-19 prevention. Based on the current stressful situation and availability of advanced technologies has provided a platform for accelerated development of the new regimen; some of these are currently in clinical trials (Table 3). These vaccines are derived from a diverse platform, such as a DNA-based, mRNA-based, adenovirus-based, and inactivated virus-based vaccine. DNA and mRNA-based vaccines offer a great advantage; they can encode for antigenic proteins, feasibility for stress-free antigen manipulation, rapid production, and the availability of multiple delivery technologies, such as electroporation and lipid nanoparticle-based and adenovirus-based vectors [116]. However, a DNA vaccine also imparts certain shortcomings if we compared it to mRNA-based vaccines, since it can potentially integrate into the human genome, have reduced immunogenicity, instability, and induction of anti-vector immunity [117]. Numbers of clinical trials are on-going for mRNA and DNA-based vaccines and are going to be in phase 3 clinical trials for mainly RNA-based vaccines (mRNA-1273
Adenoviral vector-based vaccines provides another platform to correct malignancies, including infectious diseases and cancers that are now in clinical trials [119]. There are certain advantages that adenovirus-based vectors have over the viral vectors: a broad range of tissue tropism, ease of genetic manipulation, inherent adjuvant properties, induces robust transgene-specific immune response, non-replicative in the host, and can be grown in high titer in culture. There are a couple of drawbacks associated with adenovirus-based vaccines: immunodominance against the vector gene over transgene, pre-existing immunity, sequester of the vector in liver and spleen, and inflammatory response. So far, several adenoviral-vector-based vaccines have been developed against SARS-CoV-2 infection, and those will be tested in healthy volunteers (listed in Table 3). The first generation of COVID-19-specific adenovirus-based vaccine (Ad5) presented the induction of neutralizing antibodies [120]. Second generation and other adenovirus vaccines from China, Canada, and Russia for COVID-19 are underway in clinical trials (Table 3).
Inactivated vaccines are made from pathogens that have been killed by physical or chemical treatment, and they do not have the replicative ability. Compared to live attenuated vaccines, the inactivated vaccine can be easy to produce, more easily stored, and are incapable of causing disease. However, the inactivated vaccine induces weaker immune responses compared to live attenuated vaccines. An inactivated vaccine for COVID-19 has been developed by China, and this is in phase one out of two of clinical trials (NCT04412538, NCT04352608). COVAXINTM is another inactivated vaccine for COVID-19 developed in India by Bharat Biotech in collaboration with the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) and National Institute of Virology (NIV). This indigenous inactivated vaccine received Drug Controller General of India approval for phase I and II Human Clinical Trials, and the trials will commence across India from July 2020.
Dendritic cells (DCs) are considered as the most effective antigen-presenting cells (APC), being almost 10–100 times more potent than the other APCs (monocytes and B-cells), capable of priming antigen to naïve T-cells and induce T-cell proliferation [121]. The DCs can be genetically engineered by RNA interference (RNAi), CRISPR, and other gene-editing techniques, to modify their chimeric receptor, cytokine secretion, specific antigen presentation with ultimate effects onto improving their anti-tumor efficacy and immunity
SARS CoV-2 infection as of writing has still been marked as a pandemic scenario throughout the world, with the United States, Brazil, and India being the top three leading countries in the COVID-19 pandemic. Even though scientists and medical experts are working round the clock to develop an effective treatment. Multiple therapeutic strategies so far have been attempted in the past six months to prevent the spread of SARS-CoV-2 infection and provide overall benefits to infected people. The ultimate goal of our government, researchers, and clinicians are to provide an efficacious vaccine so that our new generation will be safe in the future from this deadly infection. So far, plasma and stem cell-based therapies and vaccines are pharmaceutical interventions that are being actively explored. Several kinase inhibitors or drugs re-considered for COVID-19 therapy are in use for cancer therapy. The immunological events induced by SARS-COV-2 infection and cancer relatively similar and, therefore, the above-mentioned anticancer drugs, chemokine/cytokines inhibitors, are also more extensively recruited in clinical trials. Although lessons from the previous SARS and MERS epidemics can be drawn, there is still much to do to conclude whether the SARS-CoV-2 behaves in the same way as its predecessors or if peculiar specificities characterize it. We hope that these anticancer drugs or novel vaccines may pave the way for a more comprehensive clinical experimentation on repurposing with FDA-recommended antiviral drug combinations for the treatment of COVID-19, a line of research sustained by limited funds but of prime importance to face this new worldwide challenge.
Reference & source information: https://www.mdpi.com/
Read More on: